Work
Profile of runaway teens
What distinguishes one young runaway from another young
runaway? The work of Marie Robert, a researcher in the Research
Group on Social Aspects of Prevention at Université de
Montréal, has thrown some light on the dynamic of
adolescent runaways. There are two runaway profiles: the Fly
to (those who leave for the novelty and adventure) and
the Fly from (those who flee from home). “The
street doesn’t represent the same thing for these two
groups. For one, it’s adventure. For the other, it’s
more of a refuge,” says Marie Robert, who published
an article describing these two profiles in February in the
journal Child Abuse & Neglect.
The more impulsive runaways in the first group—the Fly
to—are mainly boys presenting behavioural disorders,
such as minor delinquency and drug problems, who have a
network of deviant peers. The second profile—the Fly
from—includes young girls who are maltreated
at home, but lack behavioural problems or a deviant network.
In youth centres, however, they are all treated the same
way. “As a result, there’s a problem of orientation,
with the risk that staff lose sight of the maltreatment
problem and act as if it did not exist, so the framework
is inadequate,” the researcher stresses.
In a broad cohort study, Marie Robert paid special attention
to the “Flight, itinerancy, and social-occupational
insertion” aspect. Her data were collected from 130
teenage runaways, aged 12 to 17, at four youth centres in
Québec (Côte-Nord, Eastern Townships , Montréal,
Québec City ). Questions covered the 12 months preceding
admission, the period during which the young people ran away
from home. She tried to examine the entire personal, family,
and social dimension—from poor relations with parents
to school dropout—in order to identify factors that
might possibly explain why the youngster ran away. The young
people and their parents filled out several questionnaires
designed to trace the major events that had taken place during
the previous year. This enabled Marie Robert to identify
the two characteristic profiles that apply to 82% of young
runaways.
One of the factors she targeted was parental violence.
As a general rule, parents declare fewer acts of aggression
and tend to minimize their violence. “There’s
a gap between teens’ testimonies and what their parents
told us. The parental data show a lower rate than the rate
declared by young people,” says Marie Robert. In spite
of this, and unsurprisingly, when she compares runaways with
non-runaways, she reports more violence declared by both
parents and teens in homes with a teen runaway. Using the
Conflict Tactics Scale (a measurement tool commonly used
in psychology), the research group tried to assess the level
of violence.
Researcher: |
Marie Robert |
Email: |
marie.robert@umontreal.ca |
Telephone: |
(514) 343-6193 |
Funding: |
National Crime Prevention
Centre of Canada |
|